Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Today's Pips Answer results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Indoctrination, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 967 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (36,569 of 37,536 keywords). This Today's Pips Answer is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Today's Pips Answer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠3%Today's Pips Answer (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751002.6% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

NYT ‘Pips’ Hints⁠5%
Forbes⁠46%By Erik Kain⁠5%7/10/2026, 6:13:54 PM