Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiny House Villages results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 136 hits . Analysis detected 974 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,244 of 37,536 keywords). This Tiny House Villages is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Tiny House Villages
Keyword details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.7% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst