Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Lammers results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Pessimism Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 2,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (19,073 of 37,536 keywords). This Tim Lammers is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Tim Lammers
Keyword details
Total words: 3,236
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst