Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiger Woods Refuses Private Driver Crash results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 778 hits. Analysis detected 2,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,322 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (8,654 of 37,536 keywords). This Tiger Woods Refuses Private Driver Crash is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Tiger Woods Refuses Private Driver Crash
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,322
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.9% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 33.5%33.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 33.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos