Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Three Peaks Challenge results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,505 hits . Analysis detected 4,743 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (26,748 of 36,389 keywords). This Three Peaks Challenge is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. Three Peaks Challenge
Keyword details
Total words: 7,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst