Keyword summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Threat Actor results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 1,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,066 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (26,221 of 37,536 keywords). This Threat Actor is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Threat Actor
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠31%Threat Actor (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,066
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos