Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Withington results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 773 hits. Analysis detected 4,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,734 of 37,536 keywords). This Thomas Withington is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Thomas Withington
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Thomas Withington (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,704
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos