Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Tracy results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Horn Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 2,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (15,367 of 37,536 keywords). This Thomas Tracy is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Thomas Tracy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠60%Thomas Tracy (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos