Keyword summary
38% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Hicks results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,981 hits . Analysis detected 12,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,661 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,908 of 37,536 keywords). This Thomas Hicks is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Thomas Hicks
Keyword details
Total words: 13,661
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst