Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Davis results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,012 hits . Analysis detected 4,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,439 of 37,536 keywords). This Thomas Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Thomas Davis
Keyword details
Total words: 4,380
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.1% 23.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst