Keyword summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 1,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theory results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 505 hits . Analysis detected 3,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,322 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,671 of 37,536 keywords). This Theory is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Theory
Keyword details
Total words: 5,322
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst