Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Specialist results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 573 hits . Analysis detected 4,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,513 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (18,678 of 35,444 keywords). This The Specialist is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. The Specialist
Keyword details
Total words: 4,513
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst