Keyword summary
49%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Sparrow & Serpent results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 1,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (32,265 of 56,410 keywords). This The Sparrow & Serpent is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
The Sparrow & Serpent
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
43%The Sparrow & Serpent (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,372
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos