Keyword summary
19% 1 analyzed article/video 225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Pub Rookwood results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 58 hits . Analysis detected 278 faulty-reasoning hits from 900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (15,681 of 54,905 keywords). This The Pub Rookwood is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. The Pub Rookwood
Keyword details
Total words: 900
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles900 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst