Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Mountaineers results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 730 hits. Analysis detected 2,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,425 of 37,536 keywords). This The Mountaineers is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
The Mountaineers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
62%The Mountaineers (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,916
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

62% percentile
025507510061.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 25.0%25.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos