Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The End Of Oak Street results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Overconfidence Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 305 hits . Analysis detected 1,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,560 of 37,536 keywords). This The End Of Oak Street is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. The End Of Oak Street
Keyword details
Total words: 3,668
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst