Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Big Bang Theory results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 1,172 hits . Analysis detected 3,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,673 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,651 of 37,536 keywords). This The Big Bang Theory is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. The Big Bang Theory
Keyword details
Total words: 2,673
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.0% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 43.9% 43.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 43.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst