Keyword summary
ā 69% 1 analyzed article/video 1,350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Australian Pink Floyd Show results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 1,604 hits . Analysis detected 2,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,050 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 56% (16,819 of 37,536 keywords). This The Australian Pink Floyd Show is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. The Australian Pink Floyd Show
Keyword details
Total words: 4,050
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Productā¦ Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 39.6% 39.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 39.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst