Keyword summary
6% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,322 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Workforce Commission results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 476 hits . Analysis detected 4,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,272 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 1% (36,408 of 36,715 keywords). This Texas Workforce Commission is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Texas Workforce Commission
Keyword details
Total words: 11,272
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 1.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst