Keyword summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video1,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Tech University System results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 659 hits. Analysis detected 4,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (20,740 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Tech University System is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Texas Tech University System
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos