Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Tech Red Raiders results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,152 hits . Analysis detected 8,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,823 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Tech Red Raiders is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Texas Tech Red Raiders
Keyword details
Total words: 8,172
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst