Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Primary results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 543 hits . Analysis detected 3,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,194 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of â 97% (1,239 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Primary is worse (more manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Texas Primary
Keyword details
Total words: 1,194
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.7% percentile 12.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 21.0% 21.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 45.5% 45.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 23.4% 23.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 35.1% 35.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 18.0% 18.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 45.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 35.1%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 0.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst