Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Map results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Genetic Fallacy , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 79% saturation with 403 hits . Analysis detected 1,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 510 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.1% and a BS Rank of 98% (757 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Map is worse (more manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. Texas Map
Keyword details
Total words: 510
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.0% percentile 15.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles510 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 79.0% 79.0% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 25.3% 25.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Framing Effect: Keyword 79.0%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 11.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst