Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Longhorns results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 747 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,749 of 37,533 keywords). This Texas Longhorns is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Texas Longhorns
Keyword details
Total words: 747
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.7% percentile 8.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles747 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 29.3% 29.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 32.0% 32.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 32.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst