Keyword summary
33%1 analyzed article/video851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Higher Education results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 227 hits. Analysis detected 1,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,553 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (25,591 of 34,684 keywords). This Texas Higher Education is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Texas Higher Education
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
27%Texas Higher Education (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,553
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos