Keyword summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Higher Education results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 227 hits . Analysis detected 1,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,553 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (25,591 of 34,684 keywords). This Texas Higher Education is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Texas Higher Education
Keyword details
Total words: 2,553
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst