Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Dream Act results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 759 hits. Analysis detected 3,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,247 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Dream Act is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Texas Dream Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
73%Texas Dream Act (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,824
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.3%22.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos