Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Am Aggies results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 177 hits . Analysis detected 1,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,429 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Am Aggies is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Texas Am Aggies
Keyword details
Total words: 780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.9% percentile 7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles780 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 17.6% 17.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.7% 22.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst