Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tentative Agreement results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 789 hits . Analysis detected 3,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,902 of 37,536 keywords). This Tentative Agreement is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Tentative Agreement
Keyword details
Total words: 5,292
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst