Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tennessee Vols results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 681 hits. Analysis detected 2,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,419 of 37,536 keywords). This Tennessee Vols is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Tennessee Vols
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
94%Tennessee Vols (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,436
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510093.6% percentile
8.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 47.4%47.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 28.8%28.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.4%8.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Keyword 47.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos