Keyword summary
87%1 analyzed article/video932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Review results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 3,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,903 of 37,533 keywords). This Technology Review is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Technology Review
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
55%Technology Review (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510055.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.1%17.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Modern Mythology of AI68%
Quillette64%By Peter L. Levin88%7/18/2026, 10:37:24 PM