Keyword summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Review results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 478 hits . Analysis detected 3,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,903 of 37,533 keywords). This Technology Review is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Technology Review
Keyword details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst