Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Policy & Regulation results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,028 hits. Analysis detected 9,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (35,086 of 37,536 keywords). This Technology Policy & Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Technology Policy & Regulation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠7%Technology Policy & Regulation (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos