Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Regulation results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 756 hits. Analysis detected 7,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,681 of 37,536 keywords). This Tech Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Tech Regulation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
32%Tech Regulation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,172
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos