Keyword summary
63%2 analyzed articles/videos504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taxpayer Money results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 930 hits. Analysis detected 5,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (19,974 of 35,635 keywords). This Taxpayer Money is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Taxpayer Money
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
44%Taxpayer Money (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,772
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos