Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Savings results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 1,666 hits. Analysis detected 10,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,348 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,801 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Savings is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Tax Savings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
72%Tax Savings (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,348
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 22.7%22.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.1%16.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos