Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Refund results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75.3% saturation with 610 hits . Analysis detected 3,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 810 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of 99% (419 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Refund is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. Tax Refund
Keyword details
Total words: 810
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.9% percentile 19.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles810 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 68.8% 68.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 75.3% 75.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 39.4% 39.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 42.0% 42.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 31.0% 31.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 27.5% 27.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Framing Effect: Keyword 75.3%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 68.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 42.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 39.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 31.0%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 27.5%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 0.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst