Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Protest results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 322 hits. Analysis detected 2,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (34,044 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Protest is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Tax Protest
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
10%Tax Protest (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,916
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751009.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos