Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Incentive results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 2,102 hits. Analysis detected 14,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,860 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (32,280 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Incentive is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Tax Incentive
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠14%Tax Incentive (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,860
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510014.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos