Keyword summary
ā 86% 1 analyzed article/video 821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Cut results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 461 hits . Analysis detected 2,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,463 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ā 70% (11,596 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Cut is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Tax Cut
Keyword details
Total words: 2,463
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.7% 18.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.7% 18.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst