Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Credit Scholarship results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 653 hits. Analysis detected 5,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (6,319 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Credit Scholarship is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Tax Credit Scholarship
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠84%Tax Credit Scholarship (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.8%12.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos