Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tarot Com results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 55.5% saturation with 7,124 hits . Analysis detected 17,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,835 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,688 of 37,536 keywords). This Tarot Com is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Tarot Com
Keyword details
Total words: 12,835
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.9% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 55.5% 55.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 26.8% 26.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Indoctrination: Keyword 55.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 26.8%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst