Keyword summary
45%3 analyzed articles/videos605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tanya Simon results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 939 hits. Analysis detected 5,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,951 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,361 of 36,755 keywords). This Tanya Simon is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Tanya Simon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
26%Tanya Simon (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,951
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate