Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tanner Banks Injured List Chase Shugart Bullpen Don Mattingly Future Phillies results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 998 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Tanner Banks Injured List Chase Shugart Bullpen Don Mattingly Future Phillies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tanner Banks Injured List Chase Shugart Bullpen Don Mattingly Future Phillies
Keyword details
Total words: 2,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos