Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Talcum Powder results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 201 hits . Analysis detected 1,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,609 of 37,536 keywords). This Talcum Powder is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Talcum Powder
Keyword details
Total words: 5,284
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst