Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Takelma Tribe results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Negativity Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 216 hits . Analysis detected 2,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,003 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Takelma Tribe is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Takelma Tribe
Keyword details
Total words: 3,003
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst