Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Take It Down Act results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 453 hits . Analysis detected 2,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,242 of 37,536 keywords). This Take It Down Act is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Take It Down Act
Keyword details
Total words: 2,532
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst