Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taiwan Tensions results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 2,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (27,675 of 37,536 keywords). This Taiwan Tensions is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Taiwan Tensions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠27%Taiwan Tensions (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,144
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos