Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taiwan Japan Relations results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 1,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 861 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,726 of 35,648 keywords). This Taiwan Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group.
Taiwan Japan Relations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
93%Taiwan Japan Relations (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 861
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510092.4% percentile
8.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles861 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 27.2%27.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 31.7%31.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 31.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos