Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taiwan Japan Relations results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 273 hits . Analysis detected 1,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 861 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,726 of 35,648 keywords). This Taiwan Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Taiwan Japan Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 861
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.4% percentile 8.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles861 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.2% 27.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 31.7% 31.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 31.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst