Keyword summary
79%2 analyzed articles/videos1,724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sylvia R Garcia results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 4,687 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,749 of 37,536 keywords). This Sylvia R Garcia is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Sylvia R Garcia
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
45%Sylvia R Garcia (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,172
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos