Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sweet Sixteen results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 978 hits . Analysis detected 5,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,069 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,710 of 37,536 keywords). This Sweet Sixteen is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Sweet Sixteen
Keyword details
Total words: 5,069
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst