Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swedish Nanny Murder results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 551 hits . Analysis detected 3,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,286 of 37,536 keywords). This Swedish Nanny Murder is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Swedish Nanny Murder
Keyword details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst